HRO: (2) Basic HRO Principles and God's Word
A foundational premise in my
writing is that if secular wisdom is true and valuable, it will have a common
foundation in God’s word. I believe
that each of these principles can be tied back to God’s word, because “His
divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness…” (2 Peter1: 3). Or, as Proverbs 9: 10 says, “The
fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.”
Principles like remaining alert, listening to advisors, having a
discerning mind and respecting people are solidly backed by scripture and
certainly related to the principles that make a High Reliability Organization
(HRO) reliable. HROs have five distinct
characteristics, according to Weick and Sutcliffe in their definitive review of
such organizations.
These principles are:
1) A preoccupation with failure.
Not like Eeyore, who always assumed the worst and expected disaster at
every turn; instead, these organizations see small failures—deviations from the
expected—as interesting and valuable data-points which may indicate a risk for
future failure. They chose to not ignore
or dismiss any deviation, but are always alert to possible distress-signals
from processes or people.
2) Resist the temptation to simplify
observations or interpretations.
It’s never just “a simple mistake” or “easily explained.” Instead, HROs seek to gain a deep
understanding of each failure as a unique event with unique lessons to impart;
this results in an organization with a complex understanding of the risks for
failure, and a sophisticated tool-box for dealing with challenges.
3) Sensitivity to operations; coupled with
both the freedom and obligation to speak up. Small things are big to an HRO. People at all levels are expected and
empowered to speak up; to regularly look for and identify unexpected deviations
from expected outcomes. Unexpected
outcomes are not met with a “huh, that’s weird” and a disinterested shrug in an
HRO. Instead, “that’s weird” is followed
up with discussion and analysis of why things didn’t go as intended.
4) Commitment to resilience. HROs know that failure will occur but that it
cannot be debilitating. Instead, errors
are quickly identified and contained, and the follow up analysis will result in
processes and protections that are even stronger going forward. HROs are learning organizations.
5) Deference to expertise. While leadership in an HRO may recognize that
“the buck stops here” in terms of ownership and accountability, those same
leaders readily defer to the individual or team with the greatest expertise,
regardless of status. Decision-making
authority is given to the experts with the know-how to solve the problem, not
necessarily to the person at the top of the hierarchy.
1) Does
the idea that God’s wisdom is ultimate, standing above all human wisdom, feel
foreign to you? Have you previously
relegated scriptural wisdom from God as only pertaining to “churchy stuff”?
2) What
secular ideas have you developed into thought habits, ways that your mind
automatically responds or behaviors that are outgrowths of those thought
habits? Are any of those habits founded
exclusively upon worldly wisdom?
3) Is
there a secular concept that your mind and heart as a Christian has
rejected? How did you address what may
have felt very dissonant, that some piece of worldly wisdom was un-Godly?
4) Does anything in the list of HRO principles above seem to conflict with your Christian faith or Biblical principles?
Comments
Post a Comment